pbjplatypus's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[D-Finder]

Meh...

Well, to begin with, I am not very good at these games. Take this into account, as I might have a bias against it.

Over all, the game was good. It had very good graphics and the animations were smooth. The fact that there was a "second mouse" was helpful, though not particularly original. However, as I said, it was helpful. The music was relaxed and peaceful, yet at the same time, exciting.

Thank you!

[Tangerine Panic]

Woah!

That is the most hilarious, random game I have ever played. Laughing histerically is not a good stratagy, though. And I suck at spelling, sorry 'bout that.

Thank you!

[Iron Works]

Good "Match Three" Game

Well, it was a good game. The (what would you call it...? Well, there's "steampunk", so I guess you'd call it "Ironpunk"? Yeah, let's go with that...). The ironpunk style of the game was good. The balls moved some what slowly... (However, that kind of makes sense. I mean, the mass of an iron ball is really large, so it's going to take a large amount of force to push it anywhere. But that's physics, and not exactly what I'm here to type about.) Anyway, it did get boring after a while. One thing I would like to know is how many levels there are. (I got to level four, but that's because I'm really tired and need to go to bed... But that's my personal life and I'm not here to type about THAT, either. (Come on, focus PlatYpus, focus.)) Okay, back on track. One improvement that I would suggest is to have power ups. (Yes, their over done, but if you get creative with them, there's bound to be some interesting ones.)

All in all, I liked the style, gameplay was fun, physics moved slowly (but logically), and power ups would have been nice.

Thanks!

[5 Differences]

Good

Good game. It was graphically appealing and challenging. If I had to make one suggestion as to how you could improve it, I would ask that you create another cursor in the opposite picture, so that it's easier to identify what you're looking at. Thanks!

[-Quadrato-]

Very interesting!

An odd concept; yet a very addicting one. Quite frankly, I found that circling a few clustered together was the most efficient way of handling things. All in all, a very good game. Thanks!

[breakit 2]

Good Breakout-style Game

I liked it. It was good. The physics engine was well-made and I didn't expect the bar to have inertia. However, I was sort of expecting the power ups (or downs) to time out. And when the didn't, I was like, "Crap. I'm stuck with a fluctuating bar."

Overall, a good game. Thank you!

[Bird Frenzy]

Meh.

Well, it wasn't great. I kind of agree with the birds not going to the rhythm, but I can phase out sounds, so I did pretty well. Also, the animation was good. Overall, it was an interesting concept, but if you could improve on the syncing, than it would be a top notch rhythm game.
Thanks!

--The PB&J PlatYpus

[Icarus Academy]

Meh?

Well, it was... An okay game. The visuals were well done, congrats. However, there are many things that could use some adjustment.
1.) No sound. At the very least, some music would work, but there needs to be something to keep an audio interest.
2.) The fact that I could not move forward or backward was distressing. Please fix this.
3.) Repetitive shooting needed. I don't mean holding down the space button, but I would prefer to be able to shoot more than twice a minute.
4.) Upgrades in between levels would be helpful to keep up inrtrest (unless you already have them... I didn't get very far, seeing that I'm not very good at this kind of game unless I'm actually really into it.)

Other than that, you have a basis for a good game; you just need to expand more on gameplay. And audio. :D

[3D Sugar Glider]

...

Very nice, the animation was good. However, I would like to see some in-flight control. Once you figure out how to make that work, than you have a very good game.

[Adventures Of Gyro Atoms]

Meh.

Grafics were okay, the style was very 80's, and the controls were slightly confusing.